For
audacity and defiance look to the hook shot.
Over the 100 or so
years since the game of cricket, there have been various cricket shots which
have been employed by batsmen to score runs off the fast bowlers. Even new innovative shots like the upper cut,
switch hit and the scoop shots have been
employed by the batsmen particularly in T-20 cricket. Every different shot displays something
unique when played perfectly. For sheer elegance , we look towards a cover
drive. A well executed cover drive is the symbol of perfect timing and elegance. Similarly a
perfectly executed straight drive defines balance and symmetry in motion, an on
drive played against spin defines the
class and mastery of a batsman over the turning ball. Having said all this, for
sheer audacity, bravery and ultimate defiance there is no better shot than a
perfectly executed hook shot off a genuine quick bowler.
A hook shot is perhaps the only shot which can
really demoralize and deflate the fast bowler. It is a perfect
marriage of the ultimate contest in cricket – that of a fast bowler steaming in and hurling hand grenades at the
opposition batsman and the batsman not just putting bat to ball but playing a
hook shot and sending the ball rocketing to the boundary. For sheer audacity there is no comparison with
the hook shot. It has to be remembered
it is also the only shot which guarantees action on a field whether it is
played well or it is mistimed . if it is
played perfectly the ball more or less rockets to the boundary, on the other
hand when the batsman fails to judge the speed of the ball it might hit the
batsman and even if it is an ugly sight seeing a batsman hit by the hard
cricket ball, we must remember that such incidents also separates the men from the boys and in that
sense action to a spectator watching in the drawing room at home or the one
witnessing it live in the ground is guaranteed. Subsequently if the batsman
slightly mistimes the hook shot, he might get caught in the deep or the ball might fall
tantalizingly in no man’s land. So in any which action is very much on the
cards when a batsman attempts a hook shot.
For me if a batsman has to consider himself to
be a great player of fast bowling, then he must be able to take on the quickies
and he cannot do that unless he plays the hook shot very well. There have been
several players who have played the hook shot , some out of sheer bravado, some
out of the fear of being hit and some to prove a point to the bowlers by taking
the attack up to him. There is nothing
more emphatic a statement when a batsman pulls of a great hook shot . there
have been players who have scored plenty of runs off the hook shot and at the
same time the same shot has brought about their downfall. Through the 70’s and 80’s which is considered
the era where great fast bowlers ruled
the roost in test cricket, there have been several fine batsmen , the likes of
Viv Richards, Roy Fredricks, Gordon Grenidge Ian Chappell, Ian Bothom and Mohinder Amaranth to name a few who made
effective use of the hook shot.
Each batsman had a
unique style of playing the hook shot. For
batsmen like Viv Richards, who had a swagger and an aura about him when he came
to the batting crease, his demeanour was such that the hook shot was an
extension of his aggressive intent and
his way of telling the bowlers that he was coming to get them and they better
be ready. Viv Richards played fearless cricket and the hook shot served him
quite well when he took on fast men like Imran Khan, Lillee and Thomson. One of
the most important aspects about batsmen who played the hook shot in the 70’s
and 80’s was that without helmet they ran the risk of wearing the hard leather
ball if they failed to judge the speed and the line of the bouncer, which makes
the shot makers all the more remarkable. Before the helmet era.
Ian Chappell loved the
cross batted shots and growing in Australia the horizontal hook and the cut
shots came very naturally to him and just when everybody lauded his younger
brother Greg about his playing in the V, Ian would be quick to retort that even he
played in the V but the difference being in square direction of the arena. Being Aussie skipper when Ian Chappell
was going through a lean trot and was
repeatedly getting dismissed playing the
hook shot, he received a huge collection of letters from fans stacked up together requesting him to
relinquish the hook shot which was bringing about his downfall, typically in Ian
chappell’s style he did not bother and scored 56 runs in the next innings with
a staggering 40runs off the hook shot.
Roy Fredricks and Gordon
Grenidge were great hookers ( pun
unintended ) of a cricket ball and the
image of Roy Fredricks playing the hook
shot against one D K Lillee in the 1975
world cup final at lords is fresh among the people who saw it, the only problem
being he trod back on the stumps and was dismissed hit wicket. One can never forget the innings which Gordon Grenidge
played against England chasing 342 at lords , Grenidge scored 214 not out where
he made liberal use of the hook shot.
Mohinder Amaranth was one helluva player when it came to playing against the genuine quick bowlers of
his era. He was possibly one of the rare
sub continental batsmen who played the hook shot successfully and he was known
for his tenacity in standing up to the
quicks, be it in Antigua when in the first innings, he scored 91 gallant
runs hitting 3 hook shots for sixes
against the likes of Roberts and holding. During the second innings, he was hit
by a ball in his mouth off Marshall but typical of the man he
scored 80 runs in the innings. He scored more than 1000 runs on the 2 tours of
West Indies and Pakistan which were 2 of the best fast bowling attacks going
around and hooked the fastest men all round the park.
Of the modern era a certain R T Ponting was one of the top batsmen who successfully played
the hook shot and with much elan. Ponting who had a natural forward lunge against fast
bowlers would not mind pulling and hooking even of the front foot. He used to
swivel beautifully and rarely had a
problem scoring off the hook shot.

No comments:
Post a Comment