Monday, April 6, 2015

Time for the ICC to do away with batsmen friendly rules.


The world cup 2015 ended just around a week ago and as expected Australia who were the favourites to win the world cup did it clinically when it mattered the most. It should not come as a surprise that Australia won the cup in their own backyard with a very professional performance throughout the tournament peaking at the right time. This world cup has highlighted a few critical issues  which the ICC needs to address . At present  there is a growing imbalance between the bat and the ball skewed hopelessly in favour of the bat. At present  it seems as if  batsmen ( read most Indian men ) seems to be bullying the poor ball ( read Indian women ). The Indian women it seems has nowhere to go but to tolerate the injustice done to her by the male counterpart. If this balance between the bat and the ball is continued to go the way it is  we could be headed for some extremely boring and unpopular cricketing contests in the near future.

 Everyone thought that since the Australian grounds were quite big with long boundaries and the scores in the world cup would be around 250-300 at best. However scores of 300 plus and even 400 were being scored with ridiculous ease. The batsmen were making a mockery of the hapless bowlers.  The bats have become  meatier and thicker across the edge. There used to be a sweet spot on the bats during the 1990’s but now the whole of the bat has become a sweet bat with balls coming off edges also going for sixes. Initially it seems very exciting for the viewers  but after a while it becomes ridiculously one sided and boring in favour of the batsmen. One of the most interesting games of the tournament was funnily a low scoring affair between Trans- Tasman rivals Australia- New Zealand. 19 wickets fell in the match and the combined totals of the teams barely crossed 300. The length of the bat is restricted but  there is no restriction on the thickness of the  edge of the bat. Surely the administrators need to place some guidelines on the specifications of the edges of the bat.

It is not just the bats which are an area of concern but also  the fielding restrictions which have  created huge problems for the  fielding captains and the bowlers. The bowlers find it almost impossible to restrict the rampaging batsmen especially in the last 15 overs. In the 2nd batting powerplay   with just 3 fielders outside the inner circle, bowlers  have no other option but  to take wickets to exert some kind of pressure on the batsmen. Even in the last 10 overs   during this world cup teams have managed to score almost  at a run rate of 12 runs per over  adding to the woes of the fielding captains.  The ICC needs to revisit the theory of 5 fielders in the circle at all times as the fielding captains tend to captain according to the regulations not according to their own imagination. When the ICC introduced 2 new balls at each end they must have thought it would help the fast bowlers swing the ball for longer durations but this move also seems to have  backfired  simply because of the fact that there are very few genuine  swing bowlers left in the game who can exploit the 2 new balls  and the fact that flat batting wickets all over the world have only made it easier for the batsmen to score easily at both ends. With 2 new balls at each end the art of reverse swing which formed an important arsenal for the fast bowlers has become redundant.  When there was just the one ball being used, the bowlers could exert some control on the batsmen with late reverse swing along with the fact that the  old ball made it harder for the batsmen to score due to lack of pace from the wickets. Due  to the non existence of reverse swing, the bowlers have forgotten to bowl deadly and fast yorkers which made the ODI’s exciting in the 90’s. The batsmen also had to manipulate the ball in the gaps  against the spinners who  turned the ball making it for interesting viewing. 

 The list of suggestions to make the game  more evenly contested is endless. Due to the commercial interests the pitch curators also prepare batting friendly wickets all over the world to ensure scores of more than 300  which are being achieved with ridiculous ease.  I am not sure the spectators tend to enjoy all 300 plus games with regularity as they tend to get bored over a period of time.  The  curators need to understand  the fact that they can prepare flat batsmen friendly pitches for the T-20 format  but for the ODI’s and tests they need to give something to the bowlers to make it a more interesting contest.  The  length of boundaries at some of the ground in India and New Zealand  are just laughable. We need to go to the  70’s and 80’s era where the boundary ropes / boards were not brought inside their full capacity.  The boundaries now a days are so short on some of these grounds that even top edges of the batsmen tend to go for sixes. There are some very senior cricketers involved in the working of the ICC  which makes it even more astonishing. Surely having played the game at the  highest level and having seen the game from the sidelines must make them realize that  there might come a time when the bowlers might revolt against the ICC for the unfair treatment meted out to them by the organisers. That day would be one of the saddest this game might witness and we should hope  that such a situation never arises and the ICC opens its eyes and stops making cosmetic and myopic changes. The fraternity of spinners and fast bowlers is an important and exciting one and needs to be safeguarded.